Showing posts with label Candidates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Candidates. Show all posts

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Why don't we set up system to cover PPCs who need to take leave?

Featured on Liberal Democrat Voice

If you haven't read it already, I would strongly recommend reading Ruth Bright's excellent article on Lib Dem Voice, None shall be enslaved by maternity. That rattling you hear is the sound of some of this party's skeletons being thrown out the cupboard onto a hard, ceramic floor.

I am appalled that people in our party have behaved in such an appalling way towards PPCs who have just given birth. Ruth states how her local party chair insisted she deal with correspondence two days after the major trauma of an emergency caesarean and while her baby was still very sick. It's worth pointing out that had Ruth been employed by the Party she would not have been allowed by law to work within 2 weeks of giving birth.

As a result of what Ruth has written, I think the party needs to look very carefully at how it can avoid situations like this in the future.  First of all, a suggestion I made in the comments was that we should have a bank of people who can be called on to step in to deal with things like correspondence if a PPC needs to take time out for whatever reason. I'm thinking of things like illness, relationship breakdown,  the incapacity or death of a parent or other family member as well as maternity leave. Life can get in the way of politics sometimes - and you just can't avoid it. If a PPC needs to take time out, they should be able to do so without recrimination.

There are plenty experienced former candidates out there who, for whatever reason, are not interested in standing any more. Why not try to recruit some of them to form an emergency "bank" of people who could provide cover in the circumstances I've outlined above?

I think the party also needs to do a bit more for candidate welfare. We need to ensure local parties and candidates have an idea of what's expected of them - and what sort of behaviour will not be tolerated under any circumstances. Candidates need to have someone they can go to if they are subject to unreasonable demands, someone who will step in and, gently, at first, explain the facts of life to their local party.

We absolutely can't stand by and watch talented candidates take the sort of sexist bullying Ruth was subjected to.

Ruth also says she had to go and breastfeed her baby in toilets at an event. This should never, ever happen.  The party should state that all its training sessions, and conferences, wherever, are breastfeeding friendly. If people have a problem with that, then, frankly, tough.  They are not obliged to look. There were the odd few in the East Midlands who were a little resistant to the idea of me breastfeeding Anna. I took to sitting behind them so they would never know what I was doing.

I am fairly certain that sexist behaviour exists in other parties - and, in fact, in Council procedures too. I once heard a tale of a committee chair who thought (sadly rightly) was miscarrying yet the officials would not let her leave the room because chairs just didn't in that particular council. That's equally unacceptable.

Do you have any other ideas as to how we can avoid the sort of situation Ruth described?

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Supporting Candidates

Duncan Borrowman and Mark Valladares have both written thoughtful pieces on how to avoid situations where the relationship between PPC and local party breaks down. Mark calls for more support for candidates. Duncan goes further by outlining some of the situations, including bullying and harrassment by small groups within local parties, that leads to selected candidates quitting.

There are two sides to this - prevention and cure. Local Parties sometimes have way too high expectations of the amount of tme a PPC can give to them - and will accept no less than 24/7. Perhaps the selection preparation should include detailed guidance to all key players in local parties about what they can reasonably expect from a PPC with similar guidance being given to approved candidates.

The easiest way to prevent tension is simply just not going to happen any time soon. At the moment, there are just too few people carrying out too many roles within the Party. We all need a bit more Party/Life balance. Burnout and stress are significant factors in relationship breakdowns. If we can't solve the problem, we at least need to be aware of it.

In terms of cure, if a PPC has resigned, particularly in a key seat, should there not be some sort of intervention to work out what has gone wrong with the aim to prevent the same thing happening again? The local party should not be allowed to select again without it and the candidate should have a long debrief. If there has been obvious fault, the party needs to have a sanction, to

Finding a way to deal with this issue sounds like a job that a full-time President of the Party could and should take on before any more good people, from both local parties and PPCs are demoralised and demotivated.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails